https://www.bitchute.com/video/wKYkq1cvYu4W/ |
What is
truly maddening to me is that people do not understand that the covid-19
vaccine… none of them have been approved by the FDA … not one … they
are only being used and released on the public via an “emergency use provision” and all the covid-19 vaccines are
labeled “experimental”… this is unbelievable that most people I speak with do not
know this … you are truly being experimented upon if you take the covid-19
vaccine … for that is what the covid-19 vaccine is labeled “experimental”, for emergency use only…
and this is how members of the military get around not taking it …
for the experiential covid-19 vaccine not to violate, the rules of “permissible Medical Experiments” under the ten points of the Nuremberg code post WW II … they need…your voluntary consent
1.
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely
essential.
Once they have your “voluntary consent” (you give them this consent,
by lining up not only voluntarily, but eagerly taking the experiential
vaccine) they can literally break all the other rules, by your saying, yes and
taking the vaccine …
After World War II, a series of trials were
held to hold members of the Nazi party responsible for a multitude of war
crimes. The trials were approved by President Harry Truman on May 2, 1945 and
were led by the United States, Great Britain, and the Soviet Union. They began
on November 20, 1945 in Nuremberg, Germany, in what became known as the Nuremberg
trials. In the trial of USA v Brandt, which became known as the "Doctors'
Trials, German physicians responsible for conducting unethical medical
procedures on humans during the war were tried. They focused on physicians who
conducted inhumane and unethical human experiments in concentration camps, in
addition to those who were involved in over 3,500,000 sterilizations of German
citizens.
The ten points of the code were given in the section of
the judges' verdict entitled "Permissible Medical Experiments":
2.
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely
essential.
3. The experiment should be such as to yield fruitful results for the good of
society, unprocurable by other methods or means of study, and not random and
unnecessary in nature.
4. The experiment should be so designed and based on the results of animal
experimentation and a knowledge of the natural history of the disease or other
problem under study that the anticipated results will justify the performance
of the experiment.
5. The experiment should be so conducted as to avoid all unnecessary physical
and mental suffering and injury.
6. No experiment should be conducted where there is an a priori reason
to believe that death or disabling injury will occur; except, perhaps, in those
experiments where the experimental physicians also serve as subjects.
7. The degree of risk to be taken should never exceed that determined by the
humanitarian importance of the problem to be solved by the experiment.
8. Proper preparations should be made and adequate facilities provided to
protect the experimental subject against even remote possibilities of injury,
disability, or death.
9. The experiment should be conducted only by scientifically qualified
persons. The highest degree of skill and care should be required through all
stages of the experiment of those who conduct or engage in the experiment.
10.
During the course
of the experiment the human subject should be at liberty to bring the
experiment to an end if he has reached the physical or mental state where
continuation of the experiment seems to him to be impossible.
11.
During the course
of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the
experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise
of the good faith, superior skill and careful judgment required of him that a
continuation of the experiment is likely to result in injury, disability, or
death to the experimental subject.